General evaluability theory
WebOct 1, 2013 · There is a 70% chance of rain tomorrow, and in 7 out of 10 cases there will be rain the next day. There is a 70% chance of rain tomorrow.What does that mean? What are the consequences of that statement for your decision making? Will you take an umbrella with you tomorrow or not? People interpret statements of this kind in very different ways. … WebMar 1, 2024 · A two-process conceptualization of numerical information processing is proposed to describe how people form impressions of a score that is described along a bounded scale and the magnitude of numbers composing the scale has less impact on judgments when the score being evaluated is extreme. We propose a two-process …
General evaluability theory
Did you know?
WebApr 12, 2024 · General evaluability theory hypothesizes that highly evaluable attributes should be consistently evaluated (i.e., demonstrate similar subjective value functions) …
WebJSTOR Home WebDec 9, 2024 · Hsee Christopher K., Zhang Jiao (2010), “General Evaluability Theory,” Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5 (4), 343–55. Crossref. PubMed. Google Scholar. Huber Joel, McCann John (1982), “The Impact of Inferential Beliefs on Product Evaluations,” Journal of Marketing Research, 19 (3), 324–33.
WebBased on the context-specific theorization framework proposed by Hong et al. (2014) and integrating general evaluability theory and construal level theory, we theorize how … WebThe main objective of this chapter is to build on Hsee and Zhang's work on the general evaluability theory (GET) and extend it in two respects. First, the chapter elaborates …
WebMar 15, 2016 · General Evaluability Theory [GET; Hsee, C. K., and J. A. Zhang. 2010. “General Evaluability Theory.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 5: 343–355] predicts greater decision dependence on benchmark performance signals received in SE than JE mode. However, GET is silent on the influence of the alternatives’ attractiveness …
Webthis research. The General Evaluability Theory (Hsee & Zhang 2010) addresses questions surrounding value sensitivity and a consumer’s accurate prediction of his or her own as well as others. The first proposition of GET states that evaluability depends on three independent factors: mode, knowledge, and nature. different cooking knives and their usesWebPubMed different cooking levels of steakWebMar 15, 2016 · General Evaluability Theory [GET; Hsee, C. K., and J. A. Zhang. 2010. “General Evaluability Theory.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 5: 343–355] … different corner chordsWebIn this setting, General Evaluability Theory (GET; Hsee and Zhang, 2010) suggests low measurement evaluability when low measurement knowledge and non-inherently … formation opeWebGeneral Evaluability Theory. Article. Full-text available. Aug 2010; Christopher K Hsee; Jiao Zhang; A central question in psychology and economics is the determination of whether individuals ... different cook of pastaWebIn this setting, General Evaluability Theory (GET; Hsee and Zhang, 2010) suggests low measurement evaluability when low measurement knowledge and non-inherently understood measures exist—both common characteristics in environmental settings. This study introduces attribute framing to the GET framework as important to consider when … different copy and paste fontsWebThis study extends general evaluability theory (GET: Hsee & Zhang, 2010) to environmental accounting by investigating the combined effects of evaluation mode and incomplete supplemental evaluability information (SEI; e.g., benchmark data) on management decisions. To elaborate, evaluation mode is the display format in which the … different cooking utensils for backpacking